[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[owner-aaa-doctors@ops.ietf.org: BOUNCE aaa-doctors@ops.ietf.org: Non-member submission from [Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>]]
- To: aaa-doctors@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: [owner-aaa-doctors@ops.ietf.org: BOUNCE aaa-doctors@ops.ietf.org: Non-member submission from [Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>]]
- From: David Kessens <david.kessens@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:13:34 -0700
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:56:28 -0400
To: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: FW: Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-radius-06.txt
Cc: aaa-doctors@ops.ietf.org, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>,
"Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, jschnizl@cisco.com
In-Reply-To: <p0602045ebcfcc2abbdb1@[10.0.0.39]>
Actually, I think the issues raised by the aaa-doctors are all issues that
have been raised earlier in the discussion of the document (except for a
couple of typos). So, our response simply summarizes earlier WG discussion
and, at this point, there's no reason to send the draft back to the WG for
additional discussion...
- Ralph
At 12:53 PM 6/21/2004 -0400, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
>It is fine if people want to review Ralph's and John's responses, but I
>would prefer that we do not have an extended discussion of these issues on
>this closed list. Somehow, we need to get this discussion onto the DHCP
>WG mailing list where it belongs.
>
>Margaret