[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: DISCUSS and Sumary of feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-rad ius-07.txt

To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Subject: RE: DISCUSS and Sumary of feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-rad ius-07.txt
From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "Aaa-Doctors (E-mail)" <aaa-doctors@ops.ietf.org>, "Thomas Narten (E-mail)" <narten@us.ibm.com>, "Margaret Wasserman (E-mail)" <margaret@thingmagic.com>, "David Kessens (E-mail)" <david.kessens@nokia.com>
In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15504E1D4CF@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15504E1D4CF@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>

As I read the AAA-Doctors Response, there was a request that
mechanisms enabling the lifting of the truncation limitation be
examined and discussed within DHC WG.

Suggestions for addressing the issue included support for
long sub-options;  another potential avenue for addressing this 
is use of multiple DHCP relay options.

In reading the response I did not notice a discussion of the options for
removing the truncation limitation.

References:
- RE: DISCUSS and Sumary of feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-rad ius-07.txt
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>

Prev by Date: RE: DISCUSS and Sumary of feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-radius-07.txt
Next by Date: RE: DISCUSS and Sumary of feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-rad ius-07.txt
Previous by thread: RE: DISCUSS and Sumary of feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-rad ius-07.txt
Next by thread: RE: DISCUSS and Sumary of feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-rad ius-07.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread