Re: Pls review documents on IESG agenda

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>]

Bernard Aboba wrote:
> FYI, the version of the SIM Document with the review changes applied is
> -15.  My understanding was that Henry was going to submit this ASAP.

That's right, and the AKA draft revision should be -14. Henry has
submitted both a couple of days ago, but they have not appeared yet.
I've set up temporary URLS to the submitted versions in the meantime:

  http://www.arkko.com/publications/eap/draft-arkko-pppext-eap-aka-14.txt
  http://www.arkko.com/publications/eap/draft-haverinen-pppext-eap-sim-15.txt

Also, as Bernard noted there's been some EAP WG expert review going
on, but the review has focused on issues that 3GPP's Stephen Hayes
requested from IETF: primarily EAP compliance and adherence to the
requirements laid out in RFC 3748 on what method specifications need
to say. The reviews and the review forms for all EAP method reviews
that we developed can be found here:

  http://mail.frascone.com/pipermail/eap/2004-October/002910.html
  http://mail.frascone.com/pipermail/eap/2004-November/003044.html
  http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/EAP/template.txt

Review comments were addressed in the AKA -13 and SIM -14 for Yoshi's
review, and AKA -14 and SIM -15 for Bernard's review.

--Jari