[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Please review documents on IESG agenda for Jan 6th
- To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
- Subject: Re: Please review documents on IESG agenda for Jan 6th
- From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:21:25 +0200
- Cc: "Aaa-Doctors (E-mail)" <aaa-doctors@ops.ietf.org>
- In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550604F111@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
- Organization: None
- References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B1550604F111@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
- Reply-to: jari.arkko@piuha.net
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316
Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
o draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-03.txt
Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1
Token: Margaret Wasserman
I read this due to general interest in the subject.
The document was well written and the protocol design
solid. I did not see any issues.
There's probably a number of competing protocols
in the v6-v4 arena, but I wouldn't know the current
situation too well. In any case the document clearly
states that there are other types of solutions for
other cases.
--Jari