RE: Pls check: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-04.txt

["Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>]

> Since this is a document coming in as individual submission via
> RFC-Editor, and since all such documents these days get an IESG
> note according to RFC3932, I think that I can remove the DISCUSS.
> 
> Any objectuions to that?

I think that's OK, i.e. minimally consistent with current IESG and RFC
Editor policies.

I will digress, for a moment, to say that I disagree with the current
policies on individual submissions that have the effect of violating
normative requirements of Standards Track protocols.  I believe that
such RFCs should never be published, even as Informational with suitable
"disclaimer" notes.  The effect of allowing this practice is to allow
(even encourage) disparate "dialects" of Standards Track protocols.
We're not here to build a Tower of Babel.

End of soap-box lecture. :-)

-- Dave