RE: [Christopher.Carroll@ropesgray.com: RE: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-04.txt]

["Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>]

Someone has written...

> > Anyway, one can clearly see that your current MUST NOT has about
> > as much effect as the Maginot line.

Sadly, this appears to be true.

> > > > Frank does make an argument that this particular VSA is used for
> the
> > > > purpose of informing the user that they have been denied access
> and
> > need to
> > > > change keys.  However, the document also requires that the NAS
not
> > tear
> > > > down service to the user after receipt of an Access-Reject:

Once again, a clear indication that Access-Challenge is the correct
message type to use.