[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Please review documents on IESG Agenda for July 21, 2005 Telechat
- To: "Aaa-Doctors (E-mail)" <aaa-doctors@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: Please review documents on IESG Agenda for July 21, 2005 Telechat
- From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 18:10:35 +0200
AAA-doctors,
pls review, specifically from an AAA point of view.
Thanks,
Bert
-----Original Message-----
2. Protocol Actions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet
infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"
2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
o draft-ietf-mpls-bgp-mpls-restart-04.txt
Graceful Restart Mechanism for BGP with MPLS (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 6
Token: Alex Zinin
o Two-document ballot: - 2 of 6
- draft-ietf-nntpext-tls-nntp-07.txt
Using TLS with NNTP (Proposed Standard)
- draft-ietf-nntpext-authinfo-09.txt
NNTP Extension for Authentication (Proposed Standard)
Note: Document shepherd: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Token: Scott Hollenbeck
o draft-ietf-vrrp-ipv6-spec-07.txt
Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol for IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 6
Token: Alex Zinin
o draft-ietf-pwe3-control-protocol-17.txt
Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance using the Label Distribution Protocol
(Proposed Standard) - 4 of 6
Token: Mark Townsley
o draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3770bis-03.txt
Certificate Extensions and Attributes Supporting Authentication in
Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) and Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN)
(Proposed Standard) - 5 of 6
Note: proto shepherd: tim.polk@nist.gov
Token: Sam Hartman
o draft-ietf-nntpext-streaming-06.txt
NNTP Extension for Streaming Feeds (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 6
Note: Document shepherd: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Token: Scott Hollenbeck
2.1.2 Returning Item
o draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-communities-09.txt
BGP Extended Communities Attribute (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3
Note: Return to agenda to see if Russ is OK with the security
considerations.
Token: Bill Fenner
o draft-ietf-mpls-rsvpte-attributes-05.txt
Encoding of Attributes for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label
Switched Path (LSP) Establishment Using RSVP-TE (Proposed Standard) - 2 of
3
Token: Alex Zinin
o draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-civil-06.txt
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic
Addresses Configuration Information (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3
Note: Back on to check RFC Editor notes
Token: Ted Hardie
2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
o draft-lim-mpeg4-mime-03.txt
MIME Type Registration for MPEG-4 (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3
Note: To IESG and I'll hold a Discuss until Last Call ends (MPEG needs
before end of summer)
Token: Allison Mankin
o draft-garudadri-avt-3gpp2-mime-02.txt
MIME Type Registrations for 3GPP2 Multimedia files (Proposed Standard) - 2
of 3
Note: To IESG and I'll hold in Discuss until Last Call ends (3GPP2 deadline
this summer)
Token: Allison Mankin
o draft-crispin-imap-rfc2359bis-04.txt
Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - UIDPLUS extension (Proposed
Standard) - 3 of 3
Token: Scott Hollenbeck
2.2.2 Returning Item
o draft-freed-media-type-reg-04.txt
Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures (BCP) - 1 of 1
Note: Returning to discuss the last remaining discuss.
Token: Scott Hollenbeck
3. Document Actions
3.1 WG Submissions
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.1.1 New Item
o draft-ietf-mmusic-offer-answer-examples-06.txt
Session Description Protocol Offer/Answer Examples (Informational) - 1 of 1
Token: Jon Peterson
3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
not, what changes would make it so?"
3.2.1 New Item
NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item
o draft-nottingham-hdrreg-http-05.txt
HTTP Header Field Registrations (Informational) - 1 of 1
Token: Scott Hollenbeck
3.3 Individual Submissions Via RFC Editor
The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.
Other matters may be recorded in comments to be passed on
to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.
3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE