FW: [braden@ISI.EDU: Radius-related Independent submissions]

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

AAA-doctors, 

can you pls review the below 3 documents and let us know if there
is any conflict with current (or planned) IETF work in this space?
This is as per RFC3932.

You are also welcome to provide technical evaluation comments.
We (or you) can feed that to the RFC-Editor and/or author(s), 
but we cannot block or mandate changes (that is RFC-editor task).

pls copy David, myself and Dan on any (private) responses. Of course
response to the aaa-doctors list are also good, and all 3 of us will
see them.

Thanks, Bert and David.

> > ----- Forwarded message from Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU> -----
> > 
> > From: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
> > Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:30:15 -0800 (PST)
> > To: rfc-ed-board@ISI.EDU, hardie@qualcomm.com, sah@428cobrajet.net
> > Subject: Radius-related Independent submissions
> > Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> >
> > Folks,
> > 
> > Within the past few weeks, the RFC Editor has received the 
> > three RADIUS-related
> > independent submissions:
> > 
> >   draft-zorn-radius-keywrap-10.txt
> > 	TITLE	"RADIUS Attributes for Key Delivery"
> > 
> >   draft-mammoliti-radius-dsl-vsa-01.txt
> > 	TITLE	"DSL Forum Vendor-Specific RADIUS Attribute"
> > 
> >   draft-zorn-radius-port-type-03.txt
> > 	TITLE:	"Additional Values for the NAS-Port-Type Attribute"
> > 
> > Could someone look at them, or suggest a reviewer?
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > RFC Editor/bb
> > 
> > 
> > ----- End Included Message -----