[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GMPLS Last Calls



Jerry,

[clipped...]
 
> As per Eve's comment at IETF-50, SPs are encouraged to post their
> requirements to the list.  It would also help if more SPs were invited to
> co-author the GMPLS drafts, to help ensure that SP requirements are more
> adequately reflected and addressed.

If someone has anything *substantial* to contribute to the GMPLS
drafts, such person should be invited to become a co-author. This
is *irrespective* of whether such person works for a SP or not. On
the other hand, just because a person works for a SP, doesn't mean
such a person should be invited to become a co-author.

Yakov.