[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: draft-ietf-mpls-lmp-02.txt
I think lmp should be a ccamp wg document, at the same time second
Tom's suggestion to add lmp into the charter.
/Yong
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Thomas D. Nadeau wrote:
>
> >Once upon a time, there was consensus to make the above document
> >(URL: http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lang-mpls-lmp-02.txt )
> >an MPLS WG document.
> >
> >It now falls under the purvey of CCAMP. Question: do you think this
> >document should be a CCAMP WG document? (You know the drill ....)
>
> Yes, I think that it should be a CCAMP wg document.
> However, in leu of the recent discussions regarding
> whether drafts are in or out of charter, I suggest that
> we explicitly add LMP to the charter to put to rest
> any doubts of its applicability to ccamp.
>
> --Tom
>
>
>
>
>