[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OLI requirements
As a carrier and one of the co-author ..
At 06:21 PM 6/18/01 -0700, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>A document on Optical Link Interface Requirements has been submitted
>(URL: http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-many-oli-reqts-00.txt )
>
>Please review the draft and comment (to _this_ list) on the following:
>1) Are the requirements stated useful?
Yes.
>2) Are there useful requirements that are missing?
So far so good
>3) Do you think that this document should be a CCAMP WG document?
> a) as it stands today?
> b) only if it changed?
> c) no, no matter what surgery is done on it?
> d) yawn ...
a)
>Extra points for terse, technical and temperate comments.
>
>We'd like to judge the sentiment towards this draft in a week or two,
>so if you'd like your comments to be acted upon, send them soon.
>
>Thanks,
>Kireeti & Vijay.
Yong Xue, Distinguished Technical Member
NG IP Technology and Architecture
UUNET/WorldCom
Ashburn, Virginia
(703)-886-5358
yxue@uu.net