[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
How about other extensions to GMPLS?
- To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: How about other extensions to GMPLS?
- From: "Yuri Landry" <yurilandry@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:23:16 -0000
- Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 06:24:14 -0700
- Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Hi,
Some recent emails mentioned the OIF UNI document. I went through it and saw
some new objects defined.
I am not going to discuss OIF works here. But I have questions to ADs and WG
Chairs about IETF GMPLS drafts. Should IETF GMPLS be the umbrella for all
such related work? Current GMPLS signaling covers objects extensions. I am
sure there will be more and more objects defined later when new applications
being identified. These objects may be generalized and not technology
specific as SONET/SDH and OTN. So shall we add them to the current GMPLS
drafts?
Regards,
Yuri
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com