RE: Drafts update

[ananth.nagarajan@mail.sprint.com]

Kireeti,

My "votes" :

1. draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt - YES 
2. draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-00.txt - YES
3. draft-kompella-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt - YES
4. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-framework-00.txt - YES - as a co-author :-)
5. draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt - Wait and 
see
6. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-routing-00.txt - YES

Thanks,
Ananth

-----Original Message-----
From: kireeti [mailto:kireeti@juniper.net]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 3:37 PM
To: ccamp
Cc: kireeti
Subject: Drafts update


Hi Folks,

Can we get a sense of the consensus whether the following drafts
should be made CCAMP WG documents?  Please respond with
(a) yes
(b) no
(c) wait

1. draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt
2. draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-00.txt
3. draft-kompella-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt
5. draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt
6. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-routing-00.txt

(Note: for draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt, the question is, should this
 be a WG document, either in MPLS or CCAMP.)

Thanks,
Kireeti.