Re: Drafts update

[Yangguang Xu <xuyg@lucent.com>]

Kireeti,

My "votes" :
 
 1. draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt - YES
 2. draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-00.txt - not sure
 3. draft-kompella-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt - if 6 is in, should this belong
to OSPF WG?
 4. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-framework-00.txt - YES
 5. draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt - not sure
 6. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-routing-00.txt - YES
 
Thanks,

Yangguang

> -----Original Message-----
> From: kireeti [mailto:kireeti@juniper.net]
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 3:37 PM
> To: ccamp
> Cc: kireeti
> Subject: Drafts update
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> Can we get a sense of the consensus whether the following drafts
> should be made CCAMP WG documents?  Please respond with
> (a) yes
> (b) no
> (c) wait
> 
> 1. draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt
> 2. draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-00.txt
> 3. draft-kompella-ospf-gmpls-extensions-02.txt
> 5. draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt
> 6. draft-many-ccamp-gmpls-routing-00.txt
> 
> (Note: for draft-dubuc-lmp-mib-02.txt, the question is, should this
>  be a WG document, either in MPLS or CCAMP.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Kireeti.