[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Optical Link Interface

To: Bilel Jamoussi <jamoussi@nortelnetworks.com>
Subject: RE: Optical Link Interface
From: Andre Fredette <fredette@photonex.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 11:35:50 -0400
Cc: Vasant Sahay <vasants@nortelnetworks.com>, "'ccamp@ops.ietf.org'" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>

Bilel,

I'm only stating what I heard personally and believe to be true.

However, If I misunderstood you, I stand corrected.

Do you believe LMP is needed and should be specified by CCAMP?

Andre

At 11:20 AM 8/1/2001 -0400, Bilel Jamoussi wrote:

Andre,

Funny you should say this given that the colleagues you reference in your note claim that LMP is not needed at all.
[Jamoussi, Bilel ] when did we say that? I spoke of priorities -- please be don't make untrue statements on other's behalf.
Bilel

Prev by Date: RE: Optical Link Interface
Next by Date: RE: Doubt in draft draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signalling-05.txt
Prev by thread: RE: Optical Link Interface
Next by thread: RE: Optical Link Interface
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread