RE: Moving right along ...

[John Drake <jdrake@calient.net>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Zhi-Wei Lin [mailto:zwlin@lucent.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:47 AM
To: Kireeti Kompella
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Moving right along ...

SNIPPED


> As for the rest, let me juxtapose your comments on switching type
> and M0/M1; I will say nothing, hoping that the juxtaposition will
> speak for itself.
> 


<z>The switching type is in a "standard" document, while the M0/M1 is in 
the "non-standard" document. I will let that speak for itself as well. 
And by the way, when you made this comment are making it as a chair or 
as a contributor?</z>


JD:  Actually, the signalling drafts are on exactly the same technical
footing as the "non-standard" draft,
so I think your attempt to draw a distinction between the two is specious at
best.  Once again, a feature
or capability is added if the community as a whole decides, through a
process of rough consensus, that it
should be added.  No one other than you has indicated an issue with
switching type and I haven't seen a groundswell
of support for M0/M1.


  



Zhi