Re: Moving right along ...

[Zhi-Wei Lin <zwlin@lucent.com>]

At the risk of sounding like a "me-too" person, me-too agree with 
Maarten. :-)

Zhi


Maarten Vissers wrote:

> Eric,
> 
> 
>>At this very late stage, since this not bringing any new functionality, and
>>since the label structure is very stable since a long time, I would prefer
>>not to restart a long technical discussion to change and re-validate the
>>draft.
>>
> 
> This label issue is brought up many months ago already and strongly supported by
> multiple people. So far it has been rejected by you, and thus not included. The
> label structure isn't stable as such since a long time... there was simply a
> rejection to properly adapt it.
> 
> For me and other SDH/SONET folks it is of utmost importance to see SDH and SONET
> be treated similarly, as also reflected in the ITU-T and T1 specifications for
> these technologies. In my opinion the current text in the draft must be adapted
> as proposed by Juergen (and by me and others in the past as well).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Maarten
> 
>