Doubt in draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-02.txt

["manoj juneja" <manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com>]

Hi All,
     I have a doubt in draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-02.txt (page
19, Annex 1, example # 4 and # 5).

The 4th example mentions request for STM-16 with multiplex section
layer transparency is formed by the application of RCC with value 0,
NCC with value 0, NVC with value 0, MT with value 1, T with flag 2 to
an STM-16 elementry signal.

Does the SDH standard support the above request ? If yes, then what
will be the label value if such a signal is requested from say STM-64
or STM-256 link ?

The 5th example is regarding the request for STM-4c signal. It mentions
that STM-4c signal (i.e. VC-4-4c with TOH) with multiplex section layer
transparency is formed by the application of RCC with flag 1, NCC with
value 1, NVC with value 0, MT with value 1 and T with flag 2 applied to
an STM-4.

Does the SDH standard support the above request ? If yes, then what
will be the label value if such a signal is requested from say STM-64
or STM-256 link ? What will be the difference in {SUKLM} if VC-4-4c had
been requested instead of STM-4c ?

Please comment.

Regards,
manoj.



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp