Re: Two week Last Call on LMP

[Jonathan Sadler <jonathan.sadler@tellabs.com>]

Oops.  I re-read my message and found a confusing statement.  See
inline.

Jonathan.Sadler@tellabs.com wrote:
> The current definition also states:
> 
> "If more than one subobject of the same Type appears, only the first
> subobject of that Type is meaningful.  Subsequent subobjects of the same
> Type MAY be ignored."
> 
> This is problematic regardless of how you interpret the minimum/maximum
> bandwidth range as it doesn't allow for multiple subobjects.

Sorry, I ment to say:

"doesn't require support for multiple subojects within a switching
capability, and encoding type."

> Multiple
> subobjects will be needed for devices that don't support all signals for
> the minimum/maximum bandwidth range given for a particular switching
> capability, and encoding type.  This support would be needed for a
> device that supported standard SONET VT1.5, VT2, STS-1, STS-3c, STS-12c,
> and STS-48c switching, but couldn't switch VT6.

Hope this clears up any confusion.

Jonathan Sadler