|
At the CCAMP meeting in SLC Tom introduced the
set of MIBs for GMPLS that we have produced.
Kireeti asked that we take the MIBs to the list
to ensure that the big issues have been addressed, that everyone is comfortable
with the approach and there really is a need for the MIBs.
Requirements are handled by...
- protocols within the IETF need MIBs, further
draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-01.txt
explicitly requires MIBs for
GMPLS
The biggest issue outstanding was whether the
Labels MIB should be included within the LSR MIB. The authors currently
feel that it should remain as a separate MIB
- to allow people to implement only the TE
MIB
without putting complex conformance
statements
in the LSR MIB
- to allow people to clearly not implement
the
Labels MIB at all.
We would welcome input on this.
Please take this opportunity to give us your
input and help shape the MIBs.
We hope to respin the drafts in a compilable form
in the next few days.
The MIBs are...
Regards,
Adrian
|