On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Randy Bush wrote: > > If the MIBs are GMPLS specific > > then why are they in the COMMON control and measurement wg? GMPLS-specific is a misnomer -- non-(MPLS-specific) [i.e., generic] is probably what was meant. More accurately: "If the MIBs contain just the deltas to the MPLS MIBs to make them generalized ...". "Generalized MPLS"-specific is a cute oxymoron. Kireeti.