Is this not the same tool that was presented in the OAM BOF in IETF 52?
In the BOF, the ADs were to decide on the proper location to progress work on MPLS related management/maintenance (a.k.a. OAM) tools. Have ADs made a decision?
Also, given that the ITU-T draft recommendation Y.1711 "OAM Mechanism for MPLS Networks" has been consented, what is the rational for standardizing this tool in isolation?
Regards,
Mina Azad
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Bonica [mailto:Ronald.P.Bonica@wcom.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 9:14 PM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02
>
>
> Folks,
>
> I would like to propose that we adopt
> draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02 as a WG
> draft.
>
> Comments?
>
> ===========================================
> Ronald P. Bonica Ph: 703 886 1681
> vBNS Engineering page: 1 888 268 8021
> Ashburn, Va.
> ===========================================
> "We are not on Earth to guard a museum, but
> to cultivate a flourishing garden of life."
> -- Angello Giuseppe Roncalli
>
>
>