RE: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02

[Randy Bush <randy@research.att.com>]

> (a) it should be a WG document?
> (b) it's good stuff, but not ready?
> (c) we need a new start?
> 
> With all the issues raised by Neil, Sharham, Dave, and others the document
> is definitely not ready.

in most wgs, if it is not a wg document we don't discuss it in the wg.

if it is ready, we give it to the iesg.

wgs exist to make in-charter documents ready.  otherwise the iesg would
just process individual submissions.

randy