Re: draft-bonica-tunneltrace-02

["Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>]

>Neil -
>
> > Thanks Ping.....nice to see a positive response from a specific 
> manufacturer
> > to our concerns as operators on this.  This is a really good positive step
> > IMO. Its a shame other manufacturers have discounted Y.1710, as what 
> Enrique
>
>Unlike the ITU, members of the IETF act as individuals.  It is
>inappropriate to generalize the remarks of one person to an entire
>company.



>Further I believe that Tom was confused between Y.1710 and
>Y.1711.

         George is correct. I mixed up the document numbers. Indeed, the
OAM requirements are a very positive first step.

         --Tom





------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.