RE: Generalized Signaling documents

[Lou Berger <lberger@movaz.com>]

At 05:07 PM 3/21/2002, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lou Berger [<mailto:lberger@movaz.com>mailto:lberger@movaz.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:53 PM
> > To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> > Cc: Kireeti Kompella; Ron Bonica (E-mail); ccamp-wg
> > Subject: RE: Generalized Signaling documents
> >
> >
> > At 04:13 PM 3/21/2002, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> >
> > >Chairs and authors/editors, if/when you go through a new
> > >revision of the drafts (any drafts), pls take action
> > >
> > >- to reduce the list of authors on the front page.
> > >   main contributors (those who wrote say 30% of the text)
> > >   can be on front page. Others can be explicitly acknoledged
> > >   in the acknowledgement section
> > >   An example is RFC2571 Acknowledgement section.
> >
> > Bert,
> >
> > An alternative approach is to list editors on the first page
> > and list all authors in the authors' addresses section.
> > I've seen this used in some older RFCs,
>
>If you point me to specific RFCs, I can try to check them and
>try to figure how that happened.

What's to figure out.

> > I also ran an this by
> > one of the rfc-editor's -  he didn't say no (or explicitly yes).
> >
>I did discuss this with my co-AD (scott) and with the RFC-Editor(s)
>this morning, and we are in agreement that your alternative seems
>not acceptable. Have you checked how it was done in RFC2571?

yes.

>Why would that not be good enough for acknowledging the
>contributions by the various people?

I'll send some private e-mail on the topic so as not to bother everyone 
else with the discussion.

Lou


>Bert