RE: Generalized Signaling documents

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

I think that I did suggest that the authors try to come up with a 
reasonable list. Pls do so and then we can take it from there.

Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Drake [mailto:jdrake@calient.net]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:35 PM
> To: 'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'; Kireeti Kompella; Ron Bonica (E-mail)
> Cc: ccamp-wg
> Subject: RE: Generalized Signaling documents
> 
> 
> Bert,
> 
> I'd agree with 'main contributors' but not 'those who wrote 
> say 30% of the
> text'.  That reminds me of trying to judge programmer productivity by
> counting line of code.  In the spirit of 'main contributors' 
> why don't you
> let the authors themselves do some soul searching and revise the list
> themselves?
> 
> This seems to be more in keeping with the spirit of the IETF.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:13 PM
> To: Kireeti Kompella; Ron Bonica (E-mail)
> Cc: ccamp-wg
> Subject: RE: Generalized Signaling documents
> 
> 
> Chairs and authors/editors, if/when you go through a new
> revision of the drafts (any drafts), pls take action
> 
> - to reduce the list of authors on the front page.
>   main contributors (those who wrote say 30% of the text)
>   can be on front page. Others can be explicitly acknoledged
>   in the acknowledgement section
>   An example is RFC2571 Acknowledgement section.
> 
> - Split your references in normative and informative 
>   references. 
> 
> For details on these RFC-guidelines, go to the www.rfc-editor.org
> web pages.
> 
> Bert 
>