Re: Progressing draft-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-frmwrk-00.txt

[Zhi-Wei Lin <zwlin@lucent.com>]

Hi Vishal,

I did not see the document you referred to in the subject line 
(draft-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-frmwrk-00.txt)...is it some other document 
you had in mind? Maybe you mean the sonet-sdh-extensions-01?

Zhi


Vishal Sharma wrote:

>Hi Kireeti
>
>The latest version of the above draft is now available on the IETF
>drafts directory. As per your email below, we'd like to request
>that this document be taken up for Last Call by the WG.
>
>We'd be happy to make any modifications that emerge from the 
>last call, and prepare a final version of the document for
>progressing it through the RFC process.
>
>Thanks,
>-Vishal
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]On
>>Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella
>>Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:42 AM
>>To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
>>Subject: Document status
>>
>>
>>Here is the document status as presented in CCAMP 53.  Please read,
>>especially if you are an author, and send corrections to Ron and me.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Kireeti.
>>-------
>>Finished Last Call in MPLS and CCAMP WGs
>>draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-cr-ldp-05.txt
>>draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-06.txt
>>draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-signaling-07.txt
>>have implementation status, so ready for IETF Last Call
>>
>>Call for consensus to send to IETF Last Call
>>draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-extensions-01.txt  -- informational
>>draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-02.txt          -- informational
>>draft-ietf-ccamp-sdhsonet-control-00.txt            -- informational
>>
>>One more WG Last Call for final changes, then IETF Last Call
>>draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-03.txt             -- proposed standard
>>draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-03.txt                         -- proposed standard
>>
>>WG Last Call
>>draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-routing-02.txt               -- proposed standard
>>draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-gmpls-extensions-04.txt       -- proposed standard
>>
>>Call for consensus for WG Last Call
>>draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-mib-01.txt ?                   -- proposed standard
>>draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-wdm-00.txt                     -- proposed standard
>>draft-ietf-ccamp-oli-reqts-00.txt                   -- informational
>>
>>Any objections to making this a WG document?
>>draft-fontana-ccamp-gmpls-g709-03.txt               -- proposed standard
>>
>>Call for consensus to make into WG documents
>>draft-bellato-ccamp-g709-framework-01.txt           -- informational
>>draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-concatenation-conversion-00.txt -- 
>>proposed standard
>>draft-mannie-ccamp-gmpls-lbm-tdm-01.txt             -- proposed standard
>>draft-mannie-gmpls-recovery-terminology-00.txt      -- informational
>>draft-bonica-tuntrace-02.txt                        -- informational
>>
>>Update, followed by call for consensus to make WG docs
>>draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-label-mib-01.txt           -- proposed standard
>>draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-lsr-mib-01.txt             -- proposed standard
>>draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-tc-mib-01.txt              -- proposed standard
>>draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-01.txt              -- proposed standard
>>
>>Call for Design Team for "GMPLS Profile for ASON/ASTN"
>>  -- understand more clearly what needs to be done here
>>  -- figure out if a design team is needed (or just a set of IDs)
>>
>