[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TE metric and graceful restart
Don,
> I have a question. Do you mean that a node that is restarting
> its routing view and learning from it's neighbors should mark
> the TE metrics to local neighbors to infinity?
That is correct.
> I think that during
> any graceful restart the TE metrics will not have a perfect view
> and local path selections should be blocked but setting the metrics
> artificially to infinity seems like the wrong way to do this in my
> opinion.
Why ? And what is in your opinion the correct way to do this ?
Yakov.
>
> Don
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Zinin [mailto:zinin@psg.com]
> > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:55 PM
> > To: Yakov Rekhter
> > Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: TE metric and graceful restart
> >
> >
> > Yakov,
> >
> > How does this improve the situation given that
> > unreserved BW of 0 is already announced?
> >
> > --
> > Alex
> >
> > Thursday, April 25, 2002, 12:47:57 PM, you wrote:
> > > Folks,
> >
> > > It was suggested to set the TE metric to infinity during graceful
> > > restart (both for ISIS and OSPF).
> >
> > > Any objections to this suggestion ???
> >
> > > Yakov.
> >
> >
> >
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1ED56.433DDC64
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="ISO-8859-1"
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
> <HTML>
> <HEAD>
> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
> <META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2655.35">
> <TITLE>RE: TE metric and graceful restart</TITLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=2>Yakov </FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=2>I have a question. Do you mean that a node that is restarting
</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>its routing view and learning from it's neighbors should mar
k </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>the TE metrics to local neighbors to infinity? I think that
during </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>any graceful restart the TE metrics will not have a perfect
view </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>and local path selections should be blocked but setting the
metrics</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>artificially to infinity seems like the wrong way to do this
in my</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>opinion. </FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=2>Don</FONT>
> </P>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=2>> -----Original Message-----</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> From: Alex Zinin [<A HREF="mailto:zinin@psg.com";>mailto
:zinin@psg.com</A>]</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 2:55 PM</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> To: Yakov Rekhter</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Subject: Re: TE metric and graceful restart</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Yakov,</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> How does this improve the situation given t
hat</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> unreserved BW of 0 is already announced?</F
ONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> -- </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Alex</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> Thursday, April 25, 2002, 12:47:57 PM, you wrote:</FONT
>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > Folks,</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > It was suggested to set the TE metric to infinity
during graceful</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > restart (both for ISIS and OSPF). </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > Any objections to this suggestion ???</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> > Yakov.</FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
> <BR><FONT SIZE=2>> </FONT>
> </P>
>
> </BODY>
> </HTML>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1ED56.433DDC64--