Re: FW: reminder if you have asked for or will ask for an agenda slot inYokohama

[Sudheer Dharanikota <sudheer@nayna.com>]

Hi Ron and Kireeti:

Can you allocate the following for the Protection and
restoration design team drafts:

- Update on the terminology draft  - 5 minutes
  <draft-ietf-gmpls-recovery-terminology-00.txt>
  Speaker: Dimitri or Eric

- Update on the recovery analysis document - 5 minutes
  <draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-analysis-01.txt>
  Speaker: Dimitri

- GMPLS recovery framework document - 10 minutes
  <draft-bala-gmpls-recovery-framework-00.txt>
  Speaker: Bala or Jonathan


Thanks

GMPLS P&R Design team


Ron Bonica wrote:

> This applies equally to the CCAMP WG
>
>                          Ron
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-mpls@UU.NET [mailto:owner-mpls@UU.NET]On Behalf Of Loa
> > Andersson
> > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 9:12 AM
> > To: mpls wg; George Swallow; Scott Bradner
> > Subject: reminder if you have asked for or will ask for an agenda slot
> > in Yokohama
> >
> >
> > All,
> >
> > just a short reminder to those who have or are requesting agenda
> > slots at the MPLS WG in Yokohama. Please consider this when you
> > prepare for the meeting.
> >
> >
> >
> >          It is not the purpose of a WG session to have
> >          presentation of the content of a document. It
> >          is assumed that all attendees will have read the
> >          drafts in advance of the meeting.
> >
> >          For documents that are work-in-progress, the
> >          presentation should cover issues resolved since
> >          the last draft followed by open issues and
> >          controversial topics with the intent to reach a
> >          resolution of said issues and topics.
> >
> >          For new work items, the presentation should focus on
> >          what the problem is and why it is necessary for the
> >          work group to address it.  Further it should be either
> >          shown how it falls within the existing charter or why
> >          and how the charter should be extended to encompass it.
> >          The solution should only be sketched.
> >
> >          The appropriate way of bringing new work to the working
> >          group is to send a draft to the mailing list and promoting
> >          discussion on the list. Slots on the agenda should be used
> >          to discuss outstanding topics that has not be solved on the
> >          mailing list.
> >
> >          For new proposals addressing issues where
> >          work-in-progess the presentation should focus
> >          on the (perceived) short-fallings of the existing
> >          work and why those issues need to be addressed
> >          both in terms of why they are required and why they
> >          cannot be addressed in the existing work.
> >          the new work must be related to existing work (i.e.
> >          compatible, mutually exclusive, outright replacement).
> >          Finally, the new solution should be skechted,
> >          explaining how the solution overcomes those issues.
> >          The primary purpose of this last part is to allow commentary
> >          from the floor, it should not be orientented toward selling
> >          the idea.
> >
> >          In all cases only a limited number of slides should be used.
> >          Speakers should budget their at least 25% of their time to
> >          allow for questions.
> >
> > Loa and George
> >
> > --
> > Loa Andersson
> > Chief Architect,
> > Utfors Research, Architecture and Future Lab (URAX)
> > Utfors AB
> > Råsundavägen 12
> > Box 525, 169 29 Solna
> > Office          +46 8 5270 2000
> > Office direct   +46 8 5270 5038
> > Mobile          +46 70 848 5038
> > Email           loa.andersson@utfors.se
> > WWW             www.utfors.se
> >
> >