[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Summary of LMP implementation/deployment reports

yangguang

you clearly understood what i mean, i just propose
to follow the rules applied to the other common 
control gmpls signalling i-d's following the well
known rough consensus achieved on the ccamp mailing 
list for these i-d's

thanks,
- dimitri.

Yangguang Xu wrote:
> 
> Dimitri,
> 
> >
> > clearly i just suggested to include the technology specifics
> > in separate technology specific i-d's, and not in the main
> > i-d (bert refers to it as the common control lmp i-d meaning
> > draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-05.txt)
> >
> 
> How about the pre-OTN specific stuff in LMP?
> 
> Are you saying that you want different rules for different drafts?
> 
> Yangguang

-- 
Papadimitriou Dimitri 
E-mail : dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be 
Private: http://www.rc.bel.alcatel.be/~papadimd/index.html
E-mail : dpapadimitriou@psg.com
Public : http://psg.com/~dpapadimitriou/
Address: Alcatel - Optical NA (CTO), Fr. Wellesplein, 1 
         B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
Phone:   Work: +32 3 2408491 - Home: +32 2 3434361