RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-06

["Ong, Lyndon" <LyOng@ciena.com>]

Ron,

Very quiet list - hope everyone is still employed...

1)  3.2.1 states that HelloInterval and HelloDeadInterval 
MUST be agreed upon by the local and remote nodes, but I
am still looking for a description of how they agree, if
it's there would appreciate a pointer to this (e.g., shortest
value wins?)

2) TE_LINK Class includes flags to indicate Fault Mgmt
or Link Verification supported/not supported.  If in fact
the Trace function that has been sucked into the SONET/SDH
draft is accepted, should another flag be assigned for this?

3) minor alignment - 13.12.1.1 references Switching
Capability and Link Encoding Type in the GMPLS-SIG
draft, but the exact wording in GMPLS-SIG seems to
be Switching Type and LSP Encoding Type.

Cheers,

L. Ong
Ciena


-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Bonica [mailto:Ronald.P.Bonica@wcom.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 6:34 AM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-06


Folks,

This message begins a WG last call for draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-06. Last call
will end one week from today, at midnight EDT on Spetember 26, 2002.


===========================================
Ronald P. Bonica       Ph: 703 886 1681
vBNS Engineering       page: 1 888 268 8021
Ashburn, Va.
===========================================
"We are not on Earth to guard a museum, but
to cultivate a flourishing garden of life."
                -- Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli