Re: IETF 55: Atlanta

[Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be]

hi ron,

i would like to know if a specific timeslot will be 
allocated for discussions concerning the potential 
items to be proposed during the wg re-chartering ?

as listed in the minutes several items are already
over the boilerplate on the other side we will be 
over the upcoming months more than certainly looking
for experimental, implementations results concerning
the efforts the wg has accomplished over two years

this said during the previous meeting i have asked
the question related to the vertical integration wrt
to the horizontal one that constitutes typically an
item such as multi-area, the issue is mainly to ask 
here if a re-consideration of the tewg outcomes can 
be safely considered and if yes under which conditions
and/or expectations

thanks in advance,
- dimitri.

Ron Bonica wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> It is time to start setting the agenda for the Atlanta meeting.
> If you want to discuss issues with drafts at the Atlanta meeting
> please request a slot to do so, by sending mail to the wg chairs.
> 
> As always the slots will be allocated for discussions according
> to what is outlined below.
> 
> Ron and Kireeti
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> It is not the purpose of a WG session to have
> presentation of the content of a document. It
> is assumed that all attendees will have read the
> drafts in advance of the meeting.
> 
> For documents that are work-in-progress, the
> presentation should cover issues resolved since
> the last draft followed by open issues and
> controversial topics with the intent to reach a
> resolution of said issues and topics.
> 
> For new work items, the presentation should focus on
> what the problem is and why it is necessary for the
> work group to address it.  Further it should be either
> shown how it falls within the existing charter or why
> and how the charter should be extended to encompass it.
> The solution should only be sketched.
> 
> The appropriate way of bringing new work to the working
> group is to send a draft to the mailing list and promoting
> discussion on the list. Slots on the agenda should be used
> to discuss outstanding topics that has not be solved on the
> mailing list.
> 
> For new proposals addressing issues where
> work-in-progess the presentation should focus
> on the (perceived) short-fallings of the existing
> work and why those issues need to be addressed
> both in terms of why they are required and why they
> cannot be addressed in the existing work.
> the new work must be related to existing work (i.e.
> compatible, mutually exclusive, outright replacement).
> Finally, the new solution should be sketched,
> explaining how the solution overcomes those issues.
> The primary purpose of this last part is to allow commentary
> from the floor, it should not be orientated toward selling
> the idea.
> 
> In all cases only a limited number of slides should be used.
> Speakers should budget their at least 25% of their time to
> allow for questions.
> 
> Individual contributors: When requesting time on the agenda,
> please indicate how your contribution supports the WG charter.
> 
> (Thanks to Loa Anderson for articulating the ground rules.)
> 
> ===========================================
> Ronald P. Bonica       Ph: 703 886 1681
> vBNS Engineering       page: 1 888 268 8021
> Ashburn, Va.
> ===========================================
> "We are not on Earth to guard a museum, but
> to cultivate a flourishing garden of life."
>                 -- Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli

-- 
Papadimitriou Dimitri 
E-mail : dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be 
Private: http://www.rc.bel.alcatel.be/~papadimd/index.html
E-mail : dpapadimitriou@psg.com
Public : http://psg.com/~dpapadimitriou/
Address: Fr. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
Phone  : Work: +32 3 2408491 - Home: +32 2 3434361