RE: WG Consensus Call: draft-swallow-gmpls-overlay-00.tx

[Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>]

Hi Peter, Hamid,

On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Peter Ashwood-Smith wrote:

> Basically it describes what to many of us is obvious behavior for GMPLS.
> After all the ER is optional in GMPLS anyway.

Well, it's clear from some of the discussion both here and elsewhere
that it's not quite so obvious, so it's good to have it written down.

> We should have described this behavior as part of GMPLS in the first place
> so it clearly corrects an omission.

Sounds fine.

Kireeti.