[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IANA Considerations for RSVP
- To: Brian Hassink <BHassink@HatterasNetworks.com>
- Subject: Re: IANA Considerations for RSVP
- From: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:09:35 -0500
- Cc: David Charlap <David.Charlap@marconi.com>, Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>, rsvp@ISI.EDU, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET, kireeti@juniper.net, iana@ISI.EDU, sob@harvard.edu, mankin@psg.com, bwijnen@lucent.com
- In-reply-to: <8052E2EA753D144EB906B7A7AA3997140B4899@mailserv.hatteras.com>
- Mail-followup-to: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>,Brian Hassink <BHassink@HatterasNetworks.com>,David Charlap <David.Charlap@marconi.com>,Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>, rsvp@ISI.EDU, ccamp@ops.ietf.org,mpls@UU.NET, kireeti@juniper.net, iana@ISI.EDU, sob@harvard.edu,mankin@psg.com, bwijnen@lucent.com
- References: <8052E2EA753D144EB906B7A7AA3997140B4899@mailserv.hatteras.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 11:06:53AM -0500, Brian Hassink allegedly wrote:
> Didn't the IETF set the precedent by extending RSVP from an IntServ
> protocol to an MPLS protocol?
Check the documentation. RSVP is not an intserv protocol. It's
(potentially) used by intserv. It's also used for other things.