[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IANA Considerations for RSVP
- To: "Lin, Zhi-Wei (Zhi)" <zwlin@lucent.com>
- Subject: Re: IANA Considerations for RSVP
- From: Eric Gray <ewgray@GraIyMage.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:42:34 -0500
- Cc: David Charlap <David.Charlap@marconi.com>, Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>, rsvp@ISI.EDU, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET, kireeti@juniper.net, iana@ISI.EDU, sob@harvard.edu, mankin@psg.com, bwijnen@lucent.com
- References: <D3F8FD817CC7DA408AEB2CAC631C042A98E5FF@nj7460exch012u.ho.lucent.com>
[ post by non-subscriber. with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers. if you wish to regularly
post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate
address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
automatically accepted. ]
Zhi,
Yours may be an equally unfair characterization. In general, the reaction
in the IETF to any intended RFC submitted as a 'fait accompli' is similar to
what you are seeing here - regardless of whether it came from an individual
or an organization representative.
"Lin, Zhi-Wei (Zhi)" wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> This seems like an unfair characterization. All requests are submitted by individuals. In terms of changing these protocols...
>
...