[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rsvp] Re: IANA Considerations for RSVP
- To: David.Charlap@marconi.com, GraIyMag@GraIyMage.com
- Subject: Re: [Rsvp] Re: IANA Considerations for RSVP
- From: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 20:20:51 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: braden@ISI.EDU, rsvp@ISI.EDU, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, mpls@UU.NET, kireeti@juniper.net, iana@ISI.EDU, sob@harvard.edu, mankin@psg.com, bwijnen@lucent.com
[ post by non-subscriber. with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers. if you wish to regularly
post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate
address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
automatically accepted. ]
*>
*> David,
*>
*> The intent to build a new protocol, rather than bastardize an existing
*> one has gotten a very large number of people burned in recent times.
Could you cite some specific examples of this? The one that comes to
mind is LDP, I suppose. I am not sure anyone was burned by LDP, were
they?
Bob Braden