Re: Question about gmpls-recovery-terminology draft

[Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be]

hi,

normally in section 7 "restoration schemes"
which will be completed once other i-d's 
are finalized - note that more description 
of this can be found in section 3.3 of

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-functional-00.txt

thanks,
- dimitri.

takao.okamawari@bt.com wrote:
> 
> Think about the following scenario.
> 
> A  *-------------* B
>    |             |
> C  *-------------* D
>    |             |
> E  *-------------* F
> 
> Two working paths are established between A-B and E-F.
> The protection path for A-B is A-C-D-B.
> The protection path for E-F is E-C-D-F.
> Since the two working paths are disjointed,
> the protection resource between C and D is common,
> i.e. shared by two working paths.
> 
> My question is where does this protection/restoration method
> fit in the gmpls-recovery-terminology document?
> 
> Takao

-- 
Papadimitriou Dimitri 
E-mail : dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be 
Private: http://www.rc.bel.alcatel.be/~papadimd/index.html
E-mail : dpapadimitriou@psg.com
Public : http://psg.com/~dpapadimitriou/
Address: Fr. Wellesplein 1, B-2018 Antwerpen, Belgium
Phone  : Work: +32 3 2408491 - Home: +32 2 3434361