Kireeti, The following drafts are candidates for discussion... GMPLS MIBs draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-00.txt draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-lsr-mib-00.txt I am not particularly keen to say anything on this subject, but perhaps the WG is owed a statement on the progress (or lack of it).
Not sure there is a reason to discuss this as part of the
agenda other than to say that these MIBs are awaiting updates
of the base MPLS MIBs.
--Tom
Crankback
draft-iwata-mpls-crankback-05.txt
Would like to get this draft into a WG even though it has more technical work to
be done.
Rumor has it that inter-area will finally make it onto the CCAMP charter!
The issue of crankback is raised by the ITU in ASON, and this might start to
address their requirements.
Route exclusion
draft-lee-ccamp-rsvp-te-exclude-route-01.txt
Route exclusion is also, perhaps, ripe for consideration. It has application
both in single and multi-area networks.
Cheers,
Adrian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kireeti Kompella" <kireeti@juniper.net>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 12:55 AM
Subject: CCAMP 56 agenda
> Hi,
>
> If you would like to speak at the CCAMP WG at the 56th IETF, please
> reply to this email -- that will help the chairs track requests.
> Also, please state which Internet draft(s) form the basis of the
> talk that others may come prepared.
>
> Note: these are *not* presentations, expositions, or tutorials.
> A small number of slides that say what has changed *since the
> last IETF*, issues that were raised in the interim, and resolutions
> to those issues is the ideal. If there hasn't been a discussion
> on the mailing list, in many cases that is a sign that the topic
> isn't (yet) ready for prime time.
>
> Thanks,
> Ron and Kireeti.
>