[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
- To: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt
- From: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:11:01 -0500
- Cc: loa@pi.se, sjtrowbridge@lucent.com, ccamp@ops.ietf.org, curtis@fictitious.org, evarma@lucent.com, gnewsome@ieee.org, mpls@UU.NET
- In-reply-to: <200303031648.h23GmwJO003841@newdev.harvard.edu>
- Mail-followup-to: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>,Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, loa@pi.se, sjtrowbridge@lucent.com,ccamp@ops.ietf.org, curtis@fictitious.org, evarma@lucent.com,gnewsome@ieee.org, mpls@UU.NET
- References: <3E638325.D254FF0F@lucent.com> <200303031648.h23GmwJO003841@newdev.harvard.edu>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 11:48:58AM -0500, Scott Bradner allegedly wrote:
> There are strong arguments that maybe the current assumptions
> should change butthis mailing list is not the place to discuss it - I
> would suggest that this dicussion be redirected to the problem-statement
> mailing list.
Or a new one (I hope). Problem-statement deserves not to be de-focused.