Sameer,
>
> Reposting, as I did not get any response. Could
> someone please answer the question.
from draft-ietf-mpls-bundle-04.txt:
If the component link is numbered, the IF_ID RSVP_HOP object, or
IF_ID TLV carries either Type 1 (IPv4 address) or Type 2 (IPv6
address) TLVs (see [GMPLS-SIG]). The address carried in the TLV
identifies the link for which label allocation must be done.
If the component link is unnumbered, the IF_ID RSVP_HOP object, or
IF_ID TLV carries Type 3 (IF_INDEX) TLV (see [GMPLS-SIG]). The
value carried in Type 3 TLV contains the identifier of the selected
component link assigned to the link by the sender of the Path/REQUEST
message. Processing this object is the same as specified in Section
"Processing the IF_ID RSVP_HOP object"/"Processing the IF_ID TLV"
of [RSVP-UNNUM]/[CRLDP-UNNUM].
Yakov.
>
> Thanks
> - Sameer
>
> --- Sameer K <sameerdw@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > From the RFC 3471 - GMPLS Signaling Functional
> > Description, Section 9.1.1, it appears that there is
> > no way for upstream node, to specify component links
> > that are numbered, in the IF-ID HOP object.
> >
> > The TLV format for IF-ID Types 4 and 5 assumes that
> > the component link is always un-numbered.
> >
> > Is this the way it was planned to be?. If yes, then
> > what should IF-ID look like for numbered component
> > link (which is a valid scenario per the Link
> > Bundling
> > draft).
> >
> > Or did I get it all wrong?
> > TIA
> > - Sameer
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
> > http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/
>
--------------------------------------------