Re: draft-lang-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-e2e-signaling-00.txt

["Adrian Farrel" <afarrel@movaz.com>]

Thanks Jonathan,

I have one remaining point for discussion.
How close is the PPRO to the XRO in
draft-lee-ccamp-rsvp-te-exclude-route-02.txt?

It was certainly our intention that XRO should be applicable to your specific
e2e requirements so I'd like to understand the issues with a view to converging
the specifications.

You said...

> We read the Lee draft, but it was more restrictive than we wanted this
> to be.  We don't want the PPRO to be an "Exclude Route".  Rather, it is
> a local policy issue how to use the PPRO.

We have an option in the XRO that says whether the exclusion is required or
desired. A desired exclusion is clearly a policy issue at the computing node.

Is there something more specific that you need?

Thanks,
Adrian