[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ASON reqts

To: Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be
Subject: Re: ASON reqts
From: Stephen Trowbridge <sjtrowbridge@lucent.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 07:51:54 -0600
Cc: John Drake <jdrake@calient.net>, "'Wijnen, Bert (Bert)'" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Organization: Lucent Technologies
References: <9D42C6E086250248810DCADA39CE7EFC972551@nimbus> <3EC0E4FC.3080201@alcatel.be>

Dimitri,

Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be wrote:
> as of today we have two flavors "ASON/GMPLS" and "GMPLS"

And these two flavors were developed to two sets of requirements.
Base GMPLS comes from the requirements of IP networks that happen
to use TDM, WDM technologies at the lower layers. The ASON
extensions come from the additional requirements of (not necessarily
IP) transport networks.

I do not believe we have a third set of requirements. Can we please
avoid creating a third variant of the protocol?
Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ASON reqts
  - From: Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be

References:
- RE: ASON reqts
  - From: John Drake <jdrake@calient.net>
- Re: ASON reqts
  - From: Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed response to the Liaison Statement on LMP Link Verifi cation
Next by Date: Re: ASON reqts
Previous by thread: Re: ASON reqts
Next by thread: Re: ASON reqts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread