RE: ASON reqts

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-andersson-mpls-g-chng-proc-00.txt.
> (It's the one you co-authored.)
> 
Aha... OK, that doc still needs approval.
We have sort of agreed that we would test-run a document from MPLS
WG through the process to see how/if it works.

But more to the point, that document is on how we control work brought
to the IETF. It does not control how we interact as decent human beings
and decent organisations with our counterparts.

The ASON specs (including how to do GMPLS for ASON) were done by ITU-T.
So we cannot just assume that we need to take over. I do not believe
that tha above change-control-procedures are intended to specify
how we take away or steal or whatever-term-you-want-use work from
other organisations.

That is why I suggested the decent communication path in my earlier
posting.

Bert
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 8:11 AM
> > To: John Drake
> > Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: ASON reqts
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Bert,
> > > 
> > > I thought that we had a process - the post RFC3474 process.  
> > 
> > I guess I must have missed that. 
> > Where is that or what are you referring to?
> > 
> > I also know that some of you do not believe we did send the ASON
> > people away... but for me that it what it boiled down to.
> > YMMV
> > 
> > Bert
> > 
>