[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ASON reqts

To: John Drake <jdrake@calient.net>
Subject: Re: ASON reqts
From: Matt Squire <mattsquire@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 21:37:27 -0400
Cc: "'Kireeti Kompella'" <kireeti@juniper.net>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <9D42C6E086250248810DCADA39CE7EFC97253D@nimbus>
References: <9D42C6E086250248810DCADA39CE7EFC97253D@nimbus>
Reply-to: mattsquire@acm.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Ditto the "I have read the document and it is ready to be a CCAMP doc".

Either that or we break out a couple dozen eggs and continue to throw them between the ITU and the IETF. I can go either way.

- Matt

John Drake wrote:

"I have read this document and it is ready to be a CCAMP WG doc"

-----Original Message-----
From: Kireeti Kompella [mailto:kireeti@juniper.net]
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 8:25 AM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: ASON reqts


I'd like to get a reading on whether this doc is ready to be a
CCAMP WG document.  Please respond (preferably publicly) with one of:
- "I have read this document and it is ready to be a CCAMP WG doc" OR
- "I have read this document, and it isn't ready to be a CCAMP doc".

References:
- RE: ASON reqts
  - From: John Drake <jdrake@calient.net>

Prev by Date: Re: ASON reqts
Next by Date: Re: ASON reqts
Previous by thread: RE: ASON reqts
Next by thread: RE: ASON reqts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread