[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Time slots for CCAMP 57



Hi Kireeti and Ron, 

Can you please allocate a 5-10 min. time slot for the following draft, 

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zamfir-explicit-resource-contr
ol-bundle-01.txt

This draft addresses the issue of component link identification for
explicit resource control and recording over TE bundled Links (please
see abstract in the following). 

Comments and input from everyone will be much appreciated, as usual.  

Thanks
 
Regards... Anca & Zafar. 

Revision History
----------------
 
Version 00 was posted on March 4, 2003, but we just missed the cut-off
time for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco. Since then we have made
some minor changes and posted version 01 on May 17th. 

Abstract: 
---------
    
   Explicit label/ resource control using the Label ERO and Label RRO 
   subobjects is defined in [RFC 3471] and [RFC 3473]. However, when TE 
   links are bundled, identification of label resource is not enough for

   the purpose of explicit resource control. Specifically, when link 
   bundling [GMPLS-BUNDLE] is used, resource identification requires 
   mechanisms to specify the component link identifier, along the TE 
   link identifier and Label. This draft defines the extensions to RSVP-
   TE [RFC2119, RFC3209] to specify component link identifiers for 
   explicit resource control and recording over GMPLS link bundles. 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
>[mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kireeti Kompella
>Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 1:40 AM
>To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
>Subject: Time slots for CCAMP 57
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Please submit your requests for time slots for the CCAMP 
>meeting at the 57th IETF to Ron and me.
>
>Note that to get a time slot, you MUST have submitted a draft 
>by the draft deadline (June 30, 9:00AM ET).  Furthermore, 
>these time slots are for discussing and resolving issues 
>raised on the mailing list, or for first time drafts, a *very* 
>brief overview of the idea, why it's relevant, and how it fits 
>into the CCAMP charter.  No presentations!
>
>If you request a time slot, please follow up and start an 
>email discussion on the CCAMP list.
>
>Thanks,
>Kireeti.
>
>