Re: Time slots for CCAMP 57

[Dimitri Papadimitriou <dpapadimitriou@psg.com>]

all, sorry for the reposting but the last url was not
accessible:

ccamp'ers, as discussed during the last meeting, see also:
<http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/03mar/slides/ccamp-3/sld2.htm>

the following targets were expected (we have tried to submit
these i-d's well in advance in order to let enough time
to the ccamp community to read/comment them):

<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-terminology-02.txt>
-> PS for July'03: update submitted (except nits and edito's
   nothing is expected to change from this stable document)

<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-analysis-01.txt>
-> Info for June'03: update submitted based on the last
   meeting discussion (scope of the whole effort is now
   accuratelly delimited)

<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-functional-00.txt>
-> PS for April'03: update expected b/f last call

<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lang-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-e2e-signaling-01.txt>
-> PS for July'03: update submitted, expectation here is
   to reach wg consensus in order to move forward (from
   this a call for consensus would be more than helpful
   in achieving expected deadlines) - a time slot of 5/10 
   minutes would be appreciated for discussing the last 
   protocol details -

any technical comment or feedback appreciated, 

thanks,
- dimitri.