A question regarding draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-sonet-sdh-08

["Diego Caviglia" <Diego.Caviglia@marconi.com>]

[ post by non-subscriber.  with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to miss
  and therefore delete posts by non-subscribers.  if you wish to regularly
  post from an address that is not subscribed to this mailing list, send a
  message to <listname>-owner@ops.ietf.org and ask to have the alternate
  address added to the list of addresses from which submissions are
  automatically accepted. ]

Hi All,,
                        could you please clarify a doubt I have about
virtual concatenation?

Quoted from the draft:
"
...
   In case of virtual concatenation, the explicit ordered list of all
   labels in the concatenation is given. Each label indicates the
   first time-slot occupied by a component of the virtually
   concatenated signal. The order of the labels must reflect the
   order of the payloads to concatenate (not the physical order of
   time-slots). The above representation limits virtual concatenation
   to remain within a single (component) link; it imposes as such a
   restriction compared to the ANSI [T1.105]/ITU-T [G.707]
   recommendations.
..
"

My doubt is about where I have to put the labes.  In the Upstream Label object?
If yes have I to use a single object header with the appropriate lenght or have I to use n objects?

Thanks in advance for your reply.

Best regards.

Diego



------------------------------------------
Diego Caviglia
Marconi - Optical Networks
ASTN/GMPLS - System Design Manager
Via A. Negrone 1/A
16153 Genoa - Italy
Phone: +390106003736