RE: Draft Minutes of ccamp wg meeting

["Richard Rabbat" <rabbat@fla.fujitsu.com>]

> -----Original Message-----


> > Rabbat	   draft-rabbat-optical-recovery-reqs-00.txt et al
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > * Summarized changes
> > * Solicited feedback
> > * Kireeti: Had requirements from te-wg, keep this as separate doc, start
> > thread on mailing list
> > * Draft stable, proposed adoption as WG draft
> > * Need more discussion on WG list
> >
> > * soumiya-lmp-fault (not on agenda from Bonica)

Not correct. Update names of drafts:
draft-rabbat-fault-notification-protocol and
draft-soumiya-lmp-fault-notification-ext ARE mentioned in Ron's agenda as
"et al". 

> > -----------------------------------------------
> > * How we reduce message overhead slide
> > * Alex Zinin - Q: Is flooding done reliably? A: Yes. Need to include
> > acknowledgement messages when assessing complexity.
> > * Adrian: arrows on lhs (signaling) indicate a pair of messages for
> > signaling.
> > * Kireeti: Was discussion comparing signaling message vs sending
> flooding
> > messages. Signaling is often faster (contrary to stmt that it is
slower).
> > Flooding has a hold down timer aspect, but signaling is faster. Issue
> with
> > using LSPs for flooding since they are link local - seems
> > redundant with IGP
> > (OSPF, IS-IS). Usurps LMP for different purpose. Important point is that
> > flooding is slower, but fewer messages as compared with signaling.
> Should
> > discuss further on list. Concerned about resolving problem of flooding
> > already solved in GP.
> > * Aboul-Magd: Same comment as Kireeti. Need to synchronize signaling and
> > routing. Don't understand why there is a need for this.
> > * Jonathon Lang: Concern that message indicates a fiber cut and
> > not messages

Please fix to Jonathan Sadler

> > for each affected LSP. A: Protection algorithms expect knowledge
> > that nodes
> > know this mapping at a protection point. Issue is that nodes may not
> know
> > this mapping when multiple levels of indirection exist. Presenter
> > requested
> > feedback on the list.
> > * Bonica: Take further discussion to the list.
> >