Re: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS vto Proposed Standard

[Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>]

Hi Dimitri,

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be wrote:

> -> "Attributes describing inter-layer relationships are not captured
> by the present document. Only single layer attributes are covered."

See the wording I proposed.

> also, i would also suggest to replace the word "draft" by "document"
> in the following sentence:
> "From the factors presented above, development of layer specific GMPLS
>   routing drafts should use the following principles for TE-link
>   attributes."

Good point.

If the above wording is okay (and there are no other comments), the
new version of the routing document (with the above two changes) and
the OSPF doc will be sent to the IESG.

Kireeti.