RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-routing-08.txt

[Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>]

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Vikram Anantha wrote:

> I did a quick search for "OC-3c" in GR-253 and couldn't find any
> reference to it. Is it possible there is a typo in the following lines
> in Section 2.1, point 3 about inheritable attributes:
>
> SNIPPET BEGIN
> "If an OC-192 link is 1+1 protected (a duplicate OC-192 exists for
> protection), then an OC-3c within that OC-192 (a higher layer) would
> inherit the same protection property."
> SNIPPET END
>
>
> Maybe it was supposed to read "STS3c" and not "OC-3c".

Where were you when we were doing the WG Last Call(s) and the IETF
Last Call? :-)

You're right.  This will be fixed along with other typos.

> On the same note, consider a STS3c LSP that traverses one "Enhanced"
> OC48 Link and one "Dedicated 1+1" OC48 Link. If this STS3c LSP is
> considered as a FA and a TE-Link in turn, what would be the protection
> property of this TE-Link?
>
> Would it be "Lowest Common Protection Type" ?

Yes, although one has to define how the LCPT is derived.  It might be
more appropriate to do this in the doc that specifies multi-layer
interaction and inheritance.

Kireeti.